Hello everyone! It's been a Month since COD WW2 was released and as you'll know very well it wasn't smooth sailing. But Headquarters is back to being a social space, or rather a loot box showroom, if you're feeling cynical. We now have the first Ranked season that actually uses the actual CWL rules and lastly the BAR got that nerf everyone seemed to think it needed.
I've also changed my opinion on a few niggles I had with the multiplayer, most things still stand. I'm still not overly keen on the majority of the maps but I've discovered a few things that have enriched my Call of Duty experience, allow me to explain:
"The easily defensible positions are perfectly suited to setting up an LMG"
In my review of WW2 I was pretty harsh on the weapon balancing, in particular against LMGs. Most of COD's maps are medium in size and the general slow nature of these guns ends up being a hindrance and not an asset. However, a place I have found them to absolutely shine is in War mode!
War modes maps are super focused attack and defend maps. You don't get the snaking sight lines and there's room to breath. The easily defensible positions are perfectly suited to setting up an LMG with the bi-pod. I've racked up ridiculous kill chains using this strategy and you can also use to the LMG for offense. LMG's have the best damage when shooting through cover and attaching FMJ seems to nullify damage drop off completely. Using an LMG with FMJ means you can wipe out defenders behind cover and buy your teammates time to capture objectives.
A perfect example of the LMG's benefits can be found on Operation Neptune, during the second phase of map on the Allied side, you're tasked with destroying ten pieces of machinery. You normally have to breach into the Axis bunker to destroy them, which is naturally teeming with enemies. The safer strategy is to use an LMG to penetrate through the walls and destroy the targets in relative safety.
"the thing is like a cannon"
Another weapon category I changed my opinion on is the Shotguns, before I said that only the Combat Shotgun was worth using, but since then and having seen TaborHill's very informative YouTube video regarding the Luftwaffe Drilling, I have seen the benefits of the other shotguns.
The Drilling is an interesting weapon, when firing from the hip the pellet spread is completely wild. It's very difficult to get enough pellets to kill an enemy but when you aim down sights, the Drilling's pellet spread changes dramatically. All the pellets collect in a very tight spread, the thing is like a cannon. It's one shot kill potential almost matches the Combat Shotgun, the ability to fire the second round so quickly gives it an edge over the other two shotguns in finishing enemies off. It's also the only shotgun that can use the incendiary shells with no downside. It seems the damage over time effect is cumulative with how many pellets hit.
I haven't heard of a nerf to the Sniper rifles or the tolerances to quick scoping but generally speaking, you don't see Sniper rifles as often as you did a couple of weeks back. The player base is steadily returning back to assault rifles for staples with a mix up of SMGs for run and gunners.
You tend to see the most variety of weapon usage in the War mode which is still just an amazing and fun mode to play. I just wish the care packages dropped more than just the flame thrower. Even some Molotovs would be handy but it's a small bit of nit picking in a mode that I otherwise find is perfect.
Headquarters is now sorted, you access it from the main multiplayer menu (that lets you select all the various modes) it does mean you have to load the area but it's not that much of an inconvenience, even if you do only use it for turning in and selecting orders.
The only odd thing I've noticed is the "Special Assignment" order hasn't refreshed, but still runs a 24 hour timer. Not sure if it was supposed to be a one off order or is supposed to refresh but the fact it's on a never-ending 24 hour timer is a bit miffing.
Primed basic training has been nerfed, they've almost completely eliminated the reduction in flinch but it's still a worthwhile perk for the extra attachment. With the Infantry Division you can have four attachments on one weapon which is pretty ridiculous and can create some interesting weapon variants, so it's still pretty versatile. On the flip side it does mean more people are experimenting with other basic trainings.
"quitting is quite rampant at the moment"
Ranked modes first season has begun and to be honest, I was quite disappointed. You play ten placement matches and then get assigned to a rank, starting from bronze and ending with masters. From there, you play matches. Win and you slowly rank up, lose and you rank down, naturally.
My two big issues with this mode is one: connections are awful. Most of the matches I played post placement were awful for connectivity. Packet loss was all over the place and bullet reg was just so off. This hopefully will change, but it is to be expected when the game is now prioritising skill over connections.
Two: the placement system was way off. I have been annihilated by players way above my skill level, but are in my ranking section. (Silver) I'll probably wait a bit to see if the better players crawl up to their respective rankings. I should make clear is well that season one is generally a placement season and so as things progress you should be finding better matched lobbies.
Speaking of the Ranked playlist, quitting is quite rampant at the moment. It doesn't seem to take long before people start bailing, which surprises me because you get temporary bans if you quit even one match.
I also was not aware that the only three modes in the CWL rule set are Capture the Flag, Hardpoint and Search and Destroy. I think, personally, Search and Destroy sticks out like a sore thumb is a more of a convoluted elimination mode. I pretty much not a fan of the S&D mode, others may not find this an issue. I was hoping to see the CWL would use COD's original modes like Kill Confirmed or even Grid Iron. I think it's a shame that the Defender mode from Infinite Warfare hasn't found it's way in WW2 or it's Ranked playlist. But that's my gripe.
Well, personally I think things are moving forward very well. I guess it'll be around two months until we see the next map pack launch, I hope to see more War mode maps are released going forward. If I had to guess, I imagine we'll see one War map to three standard maps plus a zombies map.
I do wonder how Loot crates will evolve over time, so far everything is cosmetic with the only bonuses being extra experience for certain special weapon variants. I do like that these variants change the look of the gun almost entirely, it's a nice detailed touch. I wonder what sort of new weapons we'll see and how Sledgehammer introduce them to us, I know the community is not a fan of them being locked behind loot crates. But this all remains to be seen.
Enjoy the rest of your week everybody and I'll see you again this Friday!
Hello everyone! Well Call of Duty WW2 has been out for a little while and I've already dedicated most of my evenings to it! Poor old Infinite Warfare received huge unwarranted backlash when it was announced, but little did the wider world realise that Activision had already commissioned a return to COD's roots and stopped Sledgehammer creating a sequel to Advance Warfare. Instead putting them in charge of the first COD game to go back to the world war since World At War in 2008!
"Let's not beat about the bush and get straight in to talking about the multiplayer: it's not fantastic."
Let's not beat about the bush and get straight in to talking about the multiplayer: it's not fantastic. Not to write the whole affair off, but there a two components that WW2 critically hasn't done well. The first problem is the maps: I don't know what happened in the meeting when they were talking about map design but they were very much mistaken. WW2 continues the trend of three lane maps of small to medium size, but where it goes wrong is pathways.
Let's remember Black Ops 3, (the best multiplayer since MW2 in my opinion). Three lane, mid-sized maps. Localised spawn locations at either end with some cover, two flanking routes and the larger middle route. Normally the flank routes had one interconnecting pathway into the middle route, otherwise they connect back up near the spawn hubs.
This meant that the designers had great control of player movement around the map, which means it's easier to place strategic cover, reduce camping spots, improve spawn logic and give the players a better understanding of the map.
WW2 however, chooses to have lots of interconnected pathways from the flanks to the central map area. Which in turns makes it much more difficult to predict player movement for the designers and the players. For a designer it means a bit of head scratching where to appropriately put strategic cover and for the player it means a headache when deciding how best to flank the enemy team and where to expect another player may approach from.
The issue is further compounded by the fact that aesthetics have taken some precedent in the maps this time, so yes they look more prettier but it's just stuff that gets in the way of sight lines and movement. There are pointless bits of cover littering some of the maps and makes them feel a bit maze like.
I'm not sure at all why they decided to do things this way, I don't remember anyone complaining of not having enough pathways? Sure, not everyone likes mid-sized three lane maps but WW2's maps are just a headache.
When I played BO3's multiplayer, I was able to predict enemy movements around the maps without using the minimap. The maps were that well designed you could get into a flow, but I can't in WW2. There are two many pathways to look down if you're rushing and it feels like you're flipping a coin as to which route an enemy player may come down. Unless you've got a recon plane or something going on, it's very difficult to predict player movements.
"yes, quick scoping is still here."
The next critical flaw is weapon balancing, it's pretty bad here. LMGs are a waste of your time for instance. The movement penalty, general low magazine count, recoil and long reload times makes them pale in comparison to anything else. Rifles have a far better damage profile, quicker fire rate and quicker reload times. Their clip sizes are also pretty modest. Apart from some specific occasions there's just no reason to choose an LMG over an assault rifle.
Sniping is pretty beastly this time around and yes, quick scoping is still here. Anyone using the Mountain division (more on them later) gets aim assist when aiming down sights, and the assist is pretty strong. Far more than any COD I've played since MW2. The result of this is most lobbies have multiple snipers using the one shot kill Enfield, either amazingly or pathetically. Obviously one of the issues with having sniper rifles so effective is that in the right hands it's a laser beam of death at all ranges. Some snipers can outgun shotgun users, as the sniper rounds have no damage drop off range where the shotguns can have pretty strict ranges.
Strangely, only the SMG's get silencers this time, but playing covertly isn't as big a deal this time around partly due to the map design as I said before predicting player movements is a lot trickier now. Their damage profiles are also pretty strict and there doesn't seem to be a big movement bonus over the rifles and so for a better damage profile most people go with a rifle.
Lastly shotguns get beefed up like they did in BO3, and so in the right hands they can be pretty devastating. But the rate of fire for them is pretty poor, so if you fail to nail that one shot kill you're just sitting duck even in close range.
"the pick 10 system is gone!"
I mentioned the Mountain division earlier, that's because the pick 10 system is gone! Instead you choose between five divisions that are designed around each of the weapon categories. You can level the divisions for additional perks, so for instance in the expeditionary division, if you equip a shotgun as your main weapon you can load incendiary shells into it. But only if you run shotgun as your main weapon, you don't get this ability if you main any other category of gun.
The perks you obtain as you level a division are the main rewards and do apply to any other weapon you equip as a main. For instance in the expeditionary division, as you rank up you can equip a tactical and lethal grenade at once, next rank you throw further and while sprinting and finally at the last rank you can resupply grenades off dead bodies. So the divisions are quite potent and choosing the right one for your playstyle is important. It is wise you evenly rank them up as depending on the game mode a division can help you succeed. It's also clever to mix a division with a different weapon category. Mountaineer division get stealth perks which are perfect for a rush class rather than a sniper.
Maxing out a division nets you a new weapon in it's respective weapon category and then prestiging a division rewards you with a basic training skill which are basically a perk.
There are lots of basic training skills, over twenty. They're a mixed bag of useless, half useful and useful perks. I think they really could've chopped these down or allowed us to pick at least two at once, but only choosing one out of twenty just means only the crutch trainings get chosen. There's not a whole lot to sing about the basic training perks as most of them are perks from previous games.
I like the divisions, they're a good idea. Not wholly implemented well though as some of the skills are pointless. Like a bipod for an LMG. Reduced recoil and faster reload rate, what's so bad about that? Well you cannot move, they keep the damage profile and every map already has minigun emplacements which have a better damage profile, faster fire rate and also infinite ammo!
I could go on nit picking all the strange design decisions in the multiplayer but then this article will go one for ages!
"War's maps are amazing!"
Now I want to be positive, and to be honest this is a big positive, so big I wish this mode had more maps and was the main part of the multiplayer experience and I'm talking about the War mode.
Those maps that I mentioned aren't good? Well War's maps are amazing! The maps are designed around attack and defend and the attackers are always positioned at a disadvantage, but it works!
So, to give you an idea of how the War mode works and how the maps flow let me tell you about Operation Neptune, a Omaha beach themed level.
Allies start on the beaches and have to charge up to Axis lines and plant charges to get access to the cliffside.
The Axis get to stay in the bunkers atop of the cliffs and using minigun emplacements they get to tear up the beach.
To help the Allies there are NPC soldiers running around keeping Axis players preoccupied.
Once the Allies breach the shoreline they can build ladders to scale the cliff and/or breach the lower bunker and gain access to a trench that leads up into the bunkers for additional flank routes. All the while the Axis players will be rebuilding any defenses and patrolling the trenches around the bunkers.
All the allies have to do now is sit in the bunkers to capture them like a domination flag. If the allies accomplish this then the Axis are forced to retreat to bunkers further up the hill.
In this stage of the battle the Axis have to defend radio equipment in a large bunker, and the allies have to breach the bunker and destroy the equipment. Sound simple but this bunker is easily defensible. However if the Allies destroy the radio equipment then the final phase of the mission is initiated.
Again the Axis have to retreat before the timer counts down and mortar fire commences. This last stand is at two flak cannons that the allied players must destroy by planting three bombs on each cannon and the Axis naturally have to prevent them. This last push is the hardest section of the map, once one cannon is destroyed a tank arrives to help the Axis troops and it becomes much more frantic.
The Axis players can win by halting the allies within the time limit and naturally the attacking side has the greater obstacles to overcome, but the imbalance in the maps is what makes this mode so interesting and makes the maps so playable. No more spider web pathways! These maps have such focus that they're design is just sublime and they're a real joy to play. There are only three maps currently, but I really do hope they put out more than one war map per map pack, because War is the saving grace of WW2's multiplayer.
I wish more shooter games included modes like this, it sort of takes me back to playing counter-strike, having the attack and defend dynamic.
The worst thing to say about War mode is it's very frustrating when your team don't use tactical grenades like the smokes when it comes to completing objectives and grenade spam is very present and it takes a long time to rank up the Armoured division for it's flak jacket buff.
Now I do understand the hardship in designing maps that must be suitable for team deathmatch, domination, hardpoint, search and destroy and capture the flag is pretty immense and it's no wonder that they get it wrong from time to time. Ultimately, something has to give so that all those game types can function in that map space. Because the War maps only have to accommodate one game mode they get to be refined and well balanced, WW2 really shows the weakness of having multipurpose maps.
"I found the Final Reich mission was really newbie friendly"
Nazi zombies returns again, (I guess this is now the official co-op COD mode) and I was pretty surprised by it to be honest. Infinite Warfare's spin on the mode was enjoyable and was easier to get in to for newcomers (traditionally this mode is tough as nails) and WW2 follows suit. You can play a little prologue that explains the basics as each iteration has some tweaks to the formula but I found the Final Reich mission was really newbie friendly and unlike previous games where each "easter egg" was so vague and long winded to activate, you can actually do a fair few of the objectives in the Final Reich without reading an FAQ.
One thing that does really help is you get a lot more points from zombies this time around and the cost of weapons and stat bonuses isn't extortionate. You can also choose a class which affords some passive bonuses and an ability that you can charge up before activating which add to your arsenal and are a welcome addition.
If you like COD zombies you'll be happy here as there is plenty to get your teeth into and it never gets old watching your character remove a zombies head with a shovel.
"I don't get how people can say COD games don't look good!"
Finally the campaign, I was unsure what to expect going in. The European theatre has been done to death in games and movies so was unsure how engaging WW2's campaign would be but I've got to say I was really impressed.
It looks gorgeous, that's the first thing that hit me. The character models, the environments and set pieces it's all wow, wow. I don't get how people can say COD games don't look good! They must have vaseline on their glasses or something, I mean it isn't going to have the fidelity of Battlefield but then COD runs at 60 FPS instead of 30.
And the sounds, the guns have a real grunt to them. They sound powerful, the noises really pop in your ears and the sounds of explosions all around is an audio treat. WW2 grabs your senses and throttles them, never letting go.
It plays as good as it looks and sounds, too. The Nazi AI on the normal difficulty is engaging, the level design is very good and you never spend too long doing the same thing. There's some great pacing here and I like that you don't always shoot your way out of a situation. Nazi's can be forced to flee or even surrender! It just keeps things fresh and interesting and adds humility to the game.
The campaign also sports a very interesting level called Liberation where the player infilitrates a Nazi garrison in Paris and you have to find your Nazi contact whose helping you bring down the garrison and liberate Paris. It's a really clever level and I won't go into too many details and spoil it for you. It's not quite as perfect as All Ghillied Up but it's certainly pushed the bar when it comes to interesting COD levels.
The story is nothing to write home about, you do get involved in some historical battles including The Battle of the Bulge which was a highlight for me. The characters are one dimensional and the dialogue is cheesy, it's like a 90's movie full of macho bravado. The story tries to go somewhere dark but ultimately COD knows it's not the platform for such things and nips things up very quickly.
WW2 changes the health system that's been in use for so long now and brings back a health bar and health packs. Your life does not recharge at all! You do have a teammate that will give you a free health pack after you kill enough Nazis but I never found myself too often bereft of health packs. (You can hold up to four). But I have to admit I prefer the old recharging life bar, in a COD campaign it's an interactive movie and it seems odd to have to concern yourself with this one bit of resource management.
All your allies actually have abilities that charge as you fight, one can highlight enemies for a while, another will resupply your grenades. But I was generally only fussed with the health packs as ammo is plentiful regardless.
Expect the campaign to last around six to seven hours, add a few more if playing Veteran and you could easily hit around twenty hours if you're a trophy hunter or completionist as there's quite a few hidden collectibles. So hidden I maybe found two of a possible thirty three!
Overall, WW2 is a good package but your mileage will definetly vary depending on how well you get on with the multiplayer maps and if you like the War mode.
I personally will be bingeing on War mode, well at least until I start playing Battlefront 2 but don't let my Star Wars bias dissuade you. There is fun to be had here but those maps are definitely going to be crux of whether you'll keep this game or move on. Stick to War mode, you won't regret it.
Hope you enjoyed the review and if you did, then please give a +1 and follow the blog. Have a great week everybody!
Primed basic training has been nerfed, they've almost completely eliminated the reduction in flinch but it's still a worthwhile perk for the extra attachment. With the Infantry Division you can have four attachments on one weapon which is pretty ridiculous and can create some interesting weapon variants, so it's still pretty versatile. On the flip side it does mean more people are experimenting with other basic trainings.
